1. Elvik R. Why some road safety problems are more difficult to solve than others. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:1089–96. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.020.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
2. Williams AF. Teenage drivers: Patterns of risk. J Safety Res. 2003;34:5–15. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00075-0.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
3. Lewis-Evans B. Crash involvement during the different phases of the New Zealand Graduated Driver Licensing System (GDLS) J Safety Res. 2010;41:359–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.03.006.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
4. Mayhew DR, Simpson HM, Pak A. Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2003;35:683–91. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00047-7.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
5. McCartt AT, Shabanova VI, Leaf WA. Driving experience, crashes and traffic citations of teenage beginning drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2003;35:311–20. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00006-4.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
6. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2013: Supporting a decade of action. From: www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2013/en/ Accessed: May 2014.
7. Directorate General of Traffic, Royal Omani Police. Facts and Figures. Muscat: Modern Color Press; 2014.
8. Al Reesi H, Al Maniri A, Plankermann K, Al Hinai M, Al Adawi S, Davey J, et al. Risky driving behavior among university students and staff in the Sultanate of Oman. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;58:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.021.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
9. Al-Maniri AA, Al-Reesi H, Al-Zakwani I, Nasrullah M. Road traffic fatalities in Oman from 1995 to 2009: Evidence from police reports. Int J Prev Med. 2013;4:656–63.[PMC free article][PubMed]
10. Al-Naamani A, Al-Adawi S. ‘Flying coffins’ and neglected neuropsychiatric syndromes in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2007;7:75–81.[PMC free article][PubMed]
11. Davey JD, Freeman JE. Improving road safety through deterrence-based initiatives: A review of research. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2011;11:29–37.[PMC free article][PubMed]
12. Williamson A. Young drivers and crashes: Why are young drivers over-represented in crashes? Summary of the issues. Sydney: University of New South Wales; 1999.
13. Males MA. Poverty as a determinant of young drivers’ fatal crash risks. J Safety Res. 2009;40:443–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.10.001.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
14. Chen HY, Ivers RQ, Martiniuk AL, Boufous S, Senserrick TM, Woodward M, et al. Socioeconomic status and risk of car crash injury, independent of place of residence and driving exposure: Results from the DRIVE Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64:998–1003. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.091496.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
15. Chen HY, Senserrick TM, Martiniuk A, Ivers RQ, Boufous S, Chang HY, et al. Fatal crash trends for Australian young drivers 1997-2007: Geographic and socioeconomic differentials. J Safety Res. 2010;41:123–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.12.006.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
16. Chen LH. Teenage driver crash risk: The effect of passengers. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University; 1999.
17. Preusser DF, Ferguson SA, Williams AF. The effect of teenage passengers on the fatal crash risk of teenage drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 1998;30:217–22. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00081-X.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
18. Begg DJ, Stephenson S, Alsop J, Langley J. Impact of graduated driver licensing restrictions on crashes involving young drivers in New Zealand. Inj Prev. 2001;7:292–6. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.4.292.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
19. Lam LT, Norton R, Woodward M, Connor J, Ameratunga S. Passenger carriage and car crash injury: A comparison between younger and older drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2003;35:861–7. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00091-X.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
20. Baxter JS, Manstead ASR, Stradling SG, Campbell KA, Reason JT, Parker D. Social facilitation and driver behaviour. Brit J Psychol. 1990;81:351–60. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02366.x.[Cross Ref]
21. Simons-Morton B, Lerner N, Singer J. The observed effects of teenage passengers on the risky driving behavior of teenage drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2005;37:973–82. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.04.014.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
22. Begg DJ, Langley JD, Stephenson S. Identifying factors that predict persistent driving after drinking, unsafe driving after drinking, and driving after using cannabis among young adults. Accid Anal Prev. 2003;35:669–75. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00045-3.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
23. Voas RB, Romano E, Fell J, Kelley-Baker T. Young impaired driver involvement in fatal crashes In: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies Young impaired drivers: The nature of the problem and possible solutions. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board; 2009. pp. 9–17.
24. Vachal K, Malchose D, Research Faculty What can we learn about North Dakota’s youngest drivers from their crashes? Accid Anal Prev. 2009;41:617–23. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.02.014.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
25. Morrison L, Begg DJ, Langley JD. Personal and situational influences on drink driving and sober driving among a cohort of young adults. Inj Prev. 2002;8:111–5. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.2.111.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
26. Harbeck EL, Glendon AI. How reinforcement sensitivity and perceived risk influence young drivers’ reported engagement in risky driving behaviors. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;54:73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.011.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
27. Evans-Whipp TJ, Plenty SM, Toumbourou JW, Olsson C, Rowland B, Hemphill SA. Adolescent exposure to drink driving as a predictor of young adults’ drink driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;51:185–91. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.11.016.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
28. Davey JD, Davey T, Obst PL. Drug and drink driving by university students: An exploration of the influence of attitudes. Traffic Inj Prev. 2005;6:44–52. doi: 10.1080/15389580590903168.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
29. Asbridge M, Poulin C, Donato A. Motor vehicle collision risk and driving under the influence of cannabis: Evidence from adolescents in Atlantic Canada. Accid Anal Prev. 2005;37:1025–34. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.05.006.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
30. Simons-Morton BG, Ouimet MC, Chen R, Klauer SG, Lee SE, Wang J, et al. Peer influence predicts speeding prevalence among teenage drivers. J Safety Res. 2012;43:397–403. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2012.10.002.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
31. Scott-Parker B, Watson B, King MJ. “If they say go faster or something I’ll probably go faster”: Peer influence upon the risky driving behaviour of young novices. Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference; 28–30 August 2013; Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
32. Delhomme P, Meyer T. Control motivation and young drivers decision making. Ergonomics. 1998;41:373–93. doi: 10.1080/001401398187099.[Cross Ref]
33. Yagil D. Instrumental and normative motives for compliance with traffic laws among young and older drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 1998;30:417–24. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(98)00003-7.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
34. McCartt AT, Hellinga LA, Braitman KA. Cell phones and driving: Review of research. Traffic Inj Prev. 2006;7:89–106. doi: 10.1080/15389580600651103.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
35. Walsh SP, White KM, Hyde MK, Watson B. Dialling and driving: Factors influencing intentions to use a mobile phone while driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40:1893–900. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.07.005.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
36. Neyens DM, Boyle LN. The influence of driver distraction on the severity of injuries sustained by teenage drivers and their passengers. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40:254–9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.06.005.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
37. Gauld CS, Lewis I, White KM. Concealing their communication: Exploring psychosocial predictors of young drivers’ intentions and engagement in concealed texting. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;62:285–93. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.016.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
38. White KM, Walsh SP, Hyde MK, Watson BC. Connection without caution? The role of mobile phone involvement in predicting young people’s intentions to use a mobile phone while driving. J Australasian Coll Road Safety. 2012;23:16–21.
39. Watling CN, Armstrong KA, Smith SS. Sleepiness: How a biological drive can influence other risky road user behaviours. Proceedings of the 2013 Australasian College of Road Safety (ACRS) National Conference; Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. pp. 1–12.
40. Watling CN. Sleepy driving and pulling over for a rest: Investigating individual factors that contribute to these driving behaviours. Pers Individ Dif. 2014;56:105–10. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.031.[Cross Ref]
41. Weiss HB, Kaplan S, Prato CG. Analysis of factors associated with injury severity in crashes involving young New Zealand drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;65:142–55. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.12.020.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
42. Ferguson SA, Teoh ER, McCartt AT. Progress in teenage crash risk during the last decade. J Safety Res. 2007;38:137–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.02.001.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
43. Lin ML, Fearn KT. The provisional license: Nighttime and passenger restrictions: A literature review. J Safety Res. 2003;34:51–61. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00081-6.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
44. Fell JC, Todd M, Voas RB. A national evaluation of the nighttime and passenger restriction components of graduated driver licensing. J Safety Res. 2011;42:283–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.06.001.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
45. Nokhandan MH, Bazrafshan J, Ghorbani K. A quantitative analysis of risk based on climatic factors on the roads in Iran. Meteorol Appl. 2008;15:347–57. doi: 10.1002/met.77.[Cross Ref]
46. Andrey J, Hambly D, Mills B, Afrin S. Insights into driver adaptation to inclement weather in Canada. J Transp Geogr. 2013;28:192–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.08.014.[Cross Ref]
47. Abdel-Aty M, Ekram AA, Huang H, Choi K. A study on crashes related to visibility obstruction due to fog and smoke. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:1730–7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.003.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
48. Chen HY, Ivers RQ, Martiniuk AL, Boufous S, Senserrick T, Woodward M, et al. Risk and type of crash among young drivers by rurality of residence: Findings from the DRIVE Study. Accid Anal Prev. 2009;41:676–82. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.03.005.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
49. Shope JT. Influences on youthful driving behavior and their potential for guiding interventions to reduce crashes. Inj Prev. 2006;12:i9–14. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.011874.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
50. McKnight AJ, McKnight AS. Young novice drivers: Careless or clueless? Accid Anal Prev. 2003;35:921–5. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00100-8.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
51. Wylie J. Variation in Relative Safety of Australian Drivers with Age. From: www.infrastructure.gov.au/roads/safety/publications/1996/pdf/Safe_Age_1.pdf Accessed: Mar 2014.
52. Masten SV, Hagge RA. Evaluation of California’s graduated driver licensing program. J Safety Res. 2004;35:523–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.08.006.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
53. Hatfield J, Fernandes R. The role of risk-propensity in the risky driving of younger drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2009;41:25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.08.023.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
54. Prato CG, Toledo T, Lotan T, Taubman-Ben-Ari O. Modeling the behavior of novice young drivers during the first year after licensure. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:480–6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.09.011.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
55. Al-Balbissi AH. Role of gender in road accidents. Traffic Inj Prev. 2003;4:64–73. doi: 10.1080/15389580309857.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
56. Zakrajsek JS, Shope JT, Ouimet MC, Wang J, Simons-Morton BG. Efficacy of a brief group parent-teen intervention in driver education to reduce teenage driver injury risk: A pilot study. Fam Community Health. 2009;32:175–88. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e318199482c.[PMC free article][PubMed][
What Causes Car Accidents?
The dictionary defines accident as "an unexpected and undesirable event, a mishap unforeseen and without apparent cause." Strictly speaking, most accidents are not accidents at all: they are collisions that could and should have been avoided. So, what causes them, and how can you avoid them?
Four factors contribute to the vast majority of collisions. In ascending order they are:
- Equipment Failure
- Roadway Design
- Poor Roadway Maintenance
- Driver Behavior
Over 95% of motor vehicle accidents (MVAs, in the USA, or Road Traffic Accidents, RTAs, in Europe) involve some degree of driver behavior combined with one of the other three factors. Drivers always try to blame road conditions, equipment failure, or other drivers for those accidents. When the facts are truthfully presented, however, the behavior of the implicated driver is usually the primary cause. Most are caused by excessive speed or aggressive driver behavior.
- Equipment Failure - Manufacturers are required by law to design and engineer cars that meet a minimum safety standard. Computers, combined with companies' extensive research and development, have produced safe vehicles that are easy and safe to drive. The most cited types of equipment failure are loss of brakes, tire blowouts or tread separation, and steering/suspension failure. With the exception of the recent rash of Firestone light-truck tire failures, combined totals for all reported equipment failure accounts for less than 5% of all motor vehicle accidents.
- Brakes - Modern dual-circuit brake systems have made total brake failure an unlikely event. If one side of the circuit fails, the other side is usually sufficient to stop a vehicle. Disc brakes, found on the front wheels of virtually every modern vehicle, are significantly more effective than the older drum braking systems, which can fade when hot. ABS (Anti Blockier System) or anti-lock brakes prevent the wheels from locking up during emergency braking maneuvers, allowing modern vehicles to avoid many accidents that previously would have occurred.
- Tires - Today's radial tires are significantly safer than the bias-ply tires of 25 years ago. They still, however, need attention regularly. Under inflation, the most frequent cause of tire failure is considered the main culprit in the recent Firestone tire-failure fatalities. Uneven or worn-out tires are the next most serious problem and can also lead to tire failure. Uneven wear is caused by improperly balanced tires, or misaligned or broken suspensions. Remember, all that keeps you connected to the roadway is your tires. If you don't check your own, have your mechanic check them every 5,000 miles.
- Steering & Suspension - Your suspension keeps your tires in contact with the roadway in a stable and predictable manner. Your steering enables you to go around road obstacles and avoid potential accidents. Even a safe, well-trained driver is helpless in the event of a steering or suspension system failure. Such failures are catastrophic, especially at high speeds. Have your suspension and steering systems checked out by a mechanic every 10,000 miles.
- With regular component inspections by trained individuals, equipment failures can be virtually eliminated.
- Roadway Design - Motorists may blame roadway design for accidents, but it's rarely the cause. Consultants such as the Texas Transportation Institute have spent years getting road barriers, utility poles, railroad crossings, and guardrails to their current high level of safety. Civil engineers, local governments, and law enforcement agencies all contribute to the design of safe road layouts and traffic management systems. State and federal governments provide guidelines to their construction, with design flexibility to suit local conditions. Roadways are designed by engineers with special consideration given to the following:
- Hazard Visibility - Permanent roadway hazards consist of intersections, merging lanes, bends, crests, school zones, and livestock or pedestrian crossings. Temporary hazards include road construction, parked or disabled vehicles, accidents, traffic jams, and wild animals (especially deer).
- Roadway Surfaces - Engineers can use different surfaces (for example, grooved pavement) depending on the environment, traffic speed, traffic volume, and location of the roadway (noise barriers). Roadway markings let drivers know about their ability to pass safely (dotted & double lines), the location of the roadway in inclement weather (reflective cats-eyes & stakes), and where road surface ends and the shoulder begins.
- Traffic Control Devices - Traffic light signals, speed limit signs, yield and stop signs, school & pedestrian crossings, turning lanes, police surveillance cameras, and traffic circles or roundabouts.
- Behavioral Control Devices - Built-in obstacles that limit the ability of a vehicle to travel, including crash barrels, speed bumps, pedestrian islands, raised medians, high curbing, guard rails, and concrete barriers.
- Traffic Flow - Interstate highways remain the safest roads because their flow of traffic is in one direction. One-way streets ease traffic congestion in city centers as well. Rural two-lane roadways are statistically the most dangerous because of a high incidence of deadly head-on collisions and the difficulty impatient drivers’ face while overtaking slower vehicles.
- Roadway Identification Signs - enable someone without a detailed map to travel from one place to another. They give advance notice of intersections, destinations, hazards, route numbers, mileage estimates, street names, and points of interest.
- Weather - inclement conditions can aggravate existing hazards and sometimes create new road surfaces (ice & snow).
- Poor Maintenance - Roadway maintenance contributes to some motor vehicle accidents, but not to the extent that drivers use it as an excuse. Unfortunately maintenance schedules and procedures vary greatly from city to city and state to state, so nationwide standards don't exist. Below we outline some potential roadway maintenance shortcomings that you should be aware of.
- Debris on the roadway can be a problem, and is the responsibility of local highway departments.
- Faded road signs, and signs obscured by foliage, occasionally contribute to accidents. If you know of any offending signs, contact your local police department to see if they can get the problem remedied.
- Potholes cause a small number of accidents (primarily tire & suspension failures), but the accidents usually occur at low speeds and don't cause many injuries. Call the police to get large dangerous holes attended to. Some Northern US cities have pothole complaint lines that are active during the winter and spring.
- Roadway construction is an oft-mentioned reason for accidents. Again the blame usually rests on aggressive drivers who are unwilling to merge or slow down when approaching a construction zone. In most states, fines are doubled in work zones, making it expensive as well as unsafe to speed. Stop-and-go traffic requires thoughtful, alert driving to avoid a collision with the car in front of you. Too often we worry that someone will cut in front of us in a traffic jam. The real problem is that drivers forget about the vehicle directly in front, rear-ending it while looking in their rearview mirror or daydreaming. Leave plenty of room between your car and the one directly in front of you. Our 3 second rule applies to traffic jams as well. If a few people cut in front of you, let them.
- Salting & Sanding - Many wintertime accidents are blamed on inadequate salting or sanding of icy roadways, but as so often, the real culprit is usually excessive speed. And salting only works if the ambient temperature stays above the middle teens. Recent environmental concerns have curbed widespread salting in recent years so less effective materials like clay, sand, and soot have replaced it in some areas. The fact remains that if highways are icy, speed needs to be reduced whether the roadway is salted or not.
- Driver Behavior - Humans tend to blame somebody or something else when a mistake or accident occurs. A recent European study concluded that 80% of drivers involved in motor vehicle accidents believed that the other party could have done something to prevent the accident. A miniscule 5% admitted that they were the only one at fault. Surveys consistently reveal that the majority consider themselves more skillful and safer than the average driver. Some mistakes occur when a driver becomes distracted, perhaps by a cell phone call or a spilled cup of coffee. Very few accidents result from an 'Act of God,' like a tree falling on a vehicle.
Speed Kills - The faster the speed of a vehicle, the greater the risk of an accident. The forces experienced by the human body in a collision increase exponentially as the speed increases. Smart Motorist recommends that drivers observe our 3 second rule in everyday traffic, no matter what your speed. Most people agree that going 100 mph is foolhardy and will lead to disaster. The problem is that exceeding the speed limit by only 5 mph in the wrong place can be just as dangerous. Traffic engineers and local governments have determined the maximum speeds allowable for safe travel on the nation's roadways. Speeding is a deliberate and calculated behavior where the driver knows the risk but ignores the danger. Fully 90% of all licensed drivers speed at some point in their driving career; 75% admit to committing this offense regularly.
Consider this example: a pedestrian walks out in front of a car. If the car is traveling at just 30 mph, and the driver brakes when the pedestrian is 45 feet away, there will be enough space in which to stop without hitting the pedestrian. Increase the vehicle speed by just 5 mph and the situation changes dramatically. At 35 mph, with the pedestrian 45 feet away and the driver braking at the same point, the car will be traveling at 18 mph when it hits the pedestrian. An impact at 18 mph can seriously injure or even kill the pedestrian.
Who are the bad drivers? They are young, middle-aged, and old; men and women; they drive luxury cars, sports cars, SUVs and family cars. Almost every qualified driver I know admits to some type of risky driving behavior, most commonly speeding.
Aggressive Drivers - As we've described, modern cars are manufactured to very safe standards, and the environment they're driven in is engineered to minimize the injuries suffered during an accident. The most difficult area to change is aggressive driver behavior and selfish attitudes. A 1995 study by the Automobile Association in Great Britain found that 88% of the respondents reported at least one of the behaviors listed below directed at them (in order of descending frequency):
- Aggressive tailgating
- Lights flashed at them because the other motorist was annoyed
- Aggressive or rude gestures
- Deliberate obstruction -- preventing them from moving their vehicle
- Verbal abuse
- Physical assault
The same group was then asked about aggressive behavior they had displayed towards other drivers. 40% indicated that they had never behaved aggressively towards another driver. A further 60% of the survey respondents admitted to one or more of the following behaviors (listed in order of descending frequency):
- Flashed lights at another motorist because they were annoyed with them
- Gave aggressive or rude gestures
- Gave verbal abuse
- Aggressively tailgated another motorist
- Deliberately obstructed or prevented another from moving their vehicle
- Physically assaulted another motorist (one positive response)
These behaviors are probably under-reported, since most people are not willing to admit to the more serious actions, even if no penalty exists. The majority of these incidents happened during the daylight hours (70%), on a main road (not freeway or divided highway).
NYS Police characterize aggressive driving by the following traffic violations:
- Excessive speed
- Frequent or unsafe lane changes
- Failure to signal
- Failure to yield the right of way
- Disregarding traffic controls
- Impaired driving
The NYS State Police point out that there is a difference between aggressive driving and "road rage." Road Rage behaviors, such as using the vehicle as a weapon or physically assaulting a driver or their vehicle, are not aggressive driving. They are criminal offenses, and there are laws in place to address these violent crimes.As you browsed 'What Causes Car Accidents?' you may find interest in following articles . . .